SavageDem

"I don't belong to an organized political party – I'm a Democrat." – Will Rogers

Author: SavageDem

  • Stand Against Injustice

    Sexism, racism, classism, and plenty of other –isms are alive and well in our society. We tend to think that things are coming along swimmingly, and that our biases and prejudices as a society are diminishing. But the spectre of intolerance still lurks, and with an federal administration that seems hell-bent on moving us backwards, we have to be more intentional in our efforts to promote the equality for all mantra upon which our nation was founded.

    I live in Minnesota, which has been considered for some time to be a fairly liberal state, one with many progressive thinkers (notwithstanding our current mystifying slant to the dark side with Norm Coleman, Tim Pawlenty, and a slew of others). Even so, I can on an almost daily basis hear folks conveying fear of and slurs against Mexicans, women, homosexuals, Indians (Native and “Far Eastern”), Muslims, etc. It’s not isolated. It’s not a thing of the past. Anyone that denies it is either a) naive, or b) lying to themselves.

    We recently had an adult education session in church to discuss this topic, and shared anecdotal stories. Virtually every adult out of the 25 or so present could relate a recent incident of prejudice (racial, cultural, sexual, religious) that they had witnessed. It was disturbing to hear how prevalent intolerance still is in our society, yet also a wake-up call that we have a lot of work to do.

    Our own government is engaged in a poorly-concealed campaign of injustice against Muslims, racial profiling is rampant, and women are still penalized in the work place merely because of their sex.

    Injustice is alive in America. Do we really want to be the “Land of Liberty – For The Select Few“? I didn’t think so. Stay vigilant. Don’t be afraid to speak up. Promote justice for all.

  • Polygamists Against Pornography!

    Can you believe this crap? Anyone hosting a blog in Utah needs to provide a “content rating” for their site, or possibly face fines and jail. Another abdication of responsibility: “It’s not my job to monitor what my children are viewing!” Shall we just forget the whole free speech thing and go back to a monarchy? We’re pretty much heading down that road already…

  • You might call this a pet peeve…

    Okay, so this has bugged me for a long time: are architects stupid, or do they just lack common sense? This is mainly rhetorical, as they obviously need some intellect in order to obtain the prerequisite pieces of paper required for putting “Architect” behind their names on their business cards. But I sometimes wonder…

    The reason I wonder is that it seems that nine out of ten men’s bathrooms were designed without one thought being given to even a vestige of privacy. Now, I know that men are pigs, but I choose to believe that I do not always wallow in the sludge of accumulated men-dom; that is, I think that I can (occasionally) rise above the popularly-held stereotype of men as possessing little more social grace than your common garden-variety swine. But architects either believe otherwise, or just fail to consider it (in which case I think that they should immediately be expelled from whatever fraternal organization to which architects belong).

    When I choose to urinate, I expect to do so in at least a semi-private locale. This privacy is frequently denied me due to the blatant lack of foresight (or utter stupidity) of aforementioned architects. Have you ever noticed how many restaurant bathrooms have doors that open to completely expose the Urinator? (not to be confused with the Terminator) Now, tell me: do you enjoy being on display while you urinate? Oh sure, I know some people have a fetish for that sort of thing, but I think that’s a distinct minority. Unless I’m really missing something.
    How hard is it to think just a — wee — (pun intended) bit ahead and:

    • put up a privacy partition, or
    • make the door open on the opposite jamb, or
    • re-design the opening so as not to expose the occupants?

    Let’s see:

    • Four years of private college: $120,000
    • Two years of architect graduate school: $20,000
    • Letting me pee without being observed by everyone at the bar: Priceless.
  • Fiscal responsibility? What’s that?

    Here’s a little editorial I wrote for the local paper on Bush’s “let’s screw the disadvantaged” budget…

    The proposed Bush budget is irresponsible, unconscionable and damaging to America. Citizens that truly want the United States to become a better place for all should unite in their opposition to this fiasco in the making.

  • Short-sighted energy policy

    This ANWR (Arctic National Wildlife Refuge) stuff is enough to drive one crazy. A sane person, that is. We have some oil here that, from worst case to best case, would provide the U.S. with a year to maybe two years of oil — and that’s only if the price of oil went so incredibly high that it made getting some of the oil out economically feasible. And it would take 10 years and untold billions before we saw a drop of that oil anyways! Our dependence on foreign oil would not be reduced by any appreciable margin for any appreciable time.

    So let’s just drill the effing hell out of it anyway! At least that’s the Republican plan. And today’s vote in the Senate didn’t help matters any.

    As I heard someone opine on MPR this evening, the Republicans operate from a “supply-side” mentality (just find more oil), while the Dems are preaching the demand side (let’s find ways to reduce our dependence). Do you think it’s because searching for more oil here would provide a temporary boost to the oil industry folks and the local economy (emphasis on temporary)? Or is that just too cynical?

    What in the godd*mn hell is wrong with incenting businesses to produce more efficient cars and develop alternate energy sources (like fuel cell technology, wind power, solar power), incenting consumers to use these alternate sources (with tax breaks, subsidized costs, etc.), educating folks about how we’re killing ourselves slowly if we don’t do this, and penalizing the living sh*t out of anachronistic companies that refuse to work towards these goals? Does everything have to come to a crisis before people act? Maybe that’s a rhetorical question…

  • Succinctly put

    ‘Nuff said.

  • Blessed is he that considereth the poor…

    “And so it begins.” – King Theoden

    The assault on life, liberty, and the pursuit of healthiness has begun in earnest. W(easel)’s proposed budget includes at least a $45 billion cut in Medicaid funding. Why should you care? Because the people that are affected are the ones that are the most vulnerable, and the ones that have the most to lose: the poor, the disabled, the elderly. Or does the party of so-called “moral values” really not care about that segment of society that has the least voice and least ability to defend itself? At least the governors are (sort of) standing up to the Great Satan:

    Ohio Gov. Bob Taft (R) said governors are united in their opposition to the administration’s cuts and in favor of wanting more flexibility to administer the program. “With respect to the budget itself, we’ve made it clear we oppose that and we’ll see how that issue works out here in the next few weeks,” he said.

    Governors objected to the sense that the “budget was driving policy rather than policy driving the budget,” Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour (R) said.

    “What they are saying to states is, ‘We’re going to cut you and give you more flexibility,’ and the flexibility is you can cut people off,” Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle (D) said. “That is not acceptable to me.” Medicaid costs have exploded largely because millions more people have lost private insurance, he said.

    Washington Post 3-2-2005 (full article here – free subscription required)

    And to take things to an even more ridiculous level, Bush-league is screwing the pooch from both ends: the Medicaid program has a special provision that mandates drug companies to provide it with prescription drugs to at the lowest price offered to any private purchaser. But oversight is lax in this area, and the Medicaid program is getting royally ripped off – by up to 16% in some cases! Okay, so there’s a huge opportunity for savings – let’s take advanatage of it, right? Nope. Not only is Georgie not seeking to enforce this law, he’s actively seeking to repeal it in his FY 2006 budget! So:

    1. don’t enforce the existing law that requires Medicaid drugs to be offered at the lowest price, and
    2. get rid of the law that mandates this, so that
    3. drug companies can fatten their purses further, and
    4. chop $45-60 billion off the Medicaid budget to boot

    There’s an a-hole that really cares about the people.

  • Read the Republican playbook!

    Okay, so I haven’t read anything but excerpts yet, but this is good (or bad, depending on your preferred usage) stuff. Frank Luntz is a political consultant and pollster for the Repubs, and president/CEO of Luntz Research Companies. He’s been responsible for helping shape Republican strategy for many years. In this role he has created the GOP “bible” on how to present issues and what language to use. That document has now been exposed. Here’s more good commentary on this story from the folks who obtained it.

    (more good commentary on this here)

  • What’s old is new again…

    …or is that, “History repeats itself”? Anyway, it’s fer sure that those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Why does it seem like those guys sitting around the table in Philadelphia PA 228 1/2 years ago had a clearer vision than most of our elected officials today?

    Kieran Healy has an interesting snippet from FDR’s second inaugural speech that was appropriated by Bush during his recent State of the Union speech. As U2 stole back Helter Skelter from Charlie Manson, we need to steal back FDR’s still-remarkably salient words from Bush.

  • Rape and Slaughter in the Congo

    This is the kind of thing that just makes me despair for humanity. What kind of people can systematically rape and kill children? How can anyone justify anything like this as a political tool? I’ve read many times how soldiers lose their perspective, and stop seeing people as human beings, but it’s just impossible to understand.

    I once had an intimate experience with this mentality. I was in an so-called “honors” history class in high school, and one of our assignments was to interview a WWII veteran. I talked with a member of our church that served in the South Pacific theatre. He still held a huge grudge against the Japanese, and told me quite dispassionately about burning the “Japs” out of their tunnels using a flamethrower. He really didn’t view them as quite human.

    Estimates are that 1000 people a day are dying in East Congo from war, famine, and disease – over four million in the last 10 years! Now, if I were President, this would be the sort of thing that would be of importance to me. My goal as a world citizen would be to make this tiny sphere a more prosperous and livable place for all, not just for a select few.

    Is that too Miss Universe/SaveTheWhales/Whirled-Peas sounding? Call me a romantic, a dreamer, a rebel, Dottie…a loner. But this just happens to be a bit more important to me than cheap oil, missile defense systems, and lowering my taxes.

    Some additional info about how UN peacekeeping forces are contributing to this horror.